The gap between AI hype and maritime reality
One of the strongest insights from 'Beyond the Hype…", our new research with Thetius drawing on input from over 150 leading maritime professionals, is the persistent gap between AI hype and day-to-day reality.
AI doesn't fall short due to immature technology. It fails when organisations begin their AI journey in the wrong place.
Why maritime AI implementation fails: four critical statistics
The research reveals why AI adoption in the shipping industry stalls:
37% of maritime professionals have personally witnessed an AI project fail
11% of shipping companies have formal AI policies to guide scaling
66% worry that overreliance on AI will erode human skills and judgment
23% of maritime companies train staff on AI—leaving 77% without proper preparation for AI integration
These aren't technology problems. They're organizational AI adoption challenges rooted in people and processes.
AI implementation fails when it doesn't solve employee pain points
Maritime employees care about one thing: Does this remove friction from my day?
When AI in maritime operations doesn't address visible operational challenges, it becomes "one more tool to learn" rather than something that makes work easier. The disconnect happens because AI projects begin with the technology instead of with employee workflows.
Real operational pain points in shipping operations
Chartering | Operations |
|---|---|
Charter party contract analysis requiring hours of manual review | High-volume manual updates across multiple systems |
Clause identification that risks missing critical terms | Exception handling that breaks standard workflows |
Laytime and demurrage calculations prone to disputes | Reconciling inconsistent voyage data and port data from agents and terminals |
Documentation tracking across multiple parties in the supply chain | Managing information gaps that create delays and errors in vessel operations |
These are the areas where maritime professionals feel pressure. These are where AI can offer measurable relief. But only if AI implementation starts by understanding these challenges first.
As the 'Beyond the Hype…' report emphasises (pp. 34-36), AI readiness in shipping starts with understanding employee workflows, not with selecting a model. The question isn't "what can AI do?" but "what would you rather not have to do?"
Benchmark your AI maturity
We asked 150 maritime organisations how they are using AI
Maritime AI adoption barriers: human and organisational, not technical
The research identifies the real blockers to AI scaling in the maritime industry:
Data quality and maritime data management
32% say data quality determines AI readiness, but the underlying issue is that employees don't trust the data they're being asked to work with. When port agent reports conflict with terminal data, or when voyage updates don't match operational reality, adding AI to this foundation multiplies the problem rather than solving it.
Leadership support for digital transformation in shipping
57% point to leadership support as essential, but support means more than budget approval. Employees need clarity on:
How AI fits into their role in maritime operations
What decisions AI will make versus recommend
What happens when AI gets something wrong
How success will be measured in AI pilot projects
Without this clarity, AI becomes another corporate initiative that feels disconnected from daily work in shipping companies.
Maritime AI training gaps create trust gaps
Only 23% of shipping companies train staff on AI. This creates a dangerous cycle:
Employees don't understand AI outputs in maritime applications
They can't tell when AI is working correctly or making errors
This breeds mistrust and resistance to AI adoption
Projects stall despite technical success
As one ship manager explained in the research: "People train their AI models but they don't train their people. If the crew and the office do not understand the AI outputs, it could lead to misuse, which creates mistrust."
Fear of consequences blocks honest feedback
69% fear AI might miss critical red flags in contracts or voyage planning. These aren't irrational fears. They reflect legitimate concerns about:
Who gets blamed when AI makes a mistake in critical shipping operations
Whether raising concerns about AI errors will be seen as resistance to change
How to escalate issues when AI recommendations seem wrong in maritime decision-making
When psychological safety is low, employees hide AI failures rather than reporting them. This prevents organisations from learning and improving their AI implementation strategy.
How successful shipping companies Implement AI: Lessons from Frontrunners
Companies making progress with maritime AI adoption treat it as organisational development, not technology implementation. They build around people by:
Starting with pain points, not technology capabilities
Instead of asking "what AI solutions for shipping are available?", they ask:
What tasks waste our people's time in maritime operations?
Where do manual processes introduce risk in vessel management?
What data quality issues cause rework in shipping documentation?
Which exception cases break our operational workflows?
This flips the conventional approach to AI in maritime. The technology selection comes after understanding the problem, not before.
Building data foundations that support maritime operations
Rather than collecting data for AI's sake, they improve data quality in ways that help employees now:
Standardizing agent report formats to reduce reconciliation time
Creating data validation rules that catch errors before they cascade through the supply chain
Establishing single sources of truth that employees actually trust for maritime data
Fixing integration gaps that force manual data entry in shipping systems
When data improvements help people immediately, they see AI as a continuation of this value rather than a separate initiative in digital transformation.
Training maritime professionals early to remove uncertainty
Successful shipping companies don't wait until after AI implementation to train. They:
Involve employees in pilot design and testing of AI for maritime operations
Explain how AI reaches conclusions, not just what it recommends for shipping decisions
Create safe spaces to question AI outputs in maritime applications
Establish clear escalation paths when AI seems wrong
Celebrate employees who identify AI limitations in operational contexts
This builds confidence and trust before AI touches critical workflows in vessel operations.
Running smaller, value-anchored AI pilot projects
Rather than enterprise-wide rollouts, frontrunners in maritime AI:
Pick one painful manual task as the starting point
Involve the people who currently do that task in shipping operations
Measure success by time saved or errors prevented, not just "AI adoption metrics"
Let success speak for itself before expanding scope across the fleet
As the research shows, the companies that succeed with AI in shipping "combine transparency, leadership, and industry-specific solutions, while keeping human expertise at the center of decision-making."
The path forward: making AI work in maritime operations
AI will play a major role in shipping operations and maritime logistics. The question is how long it takes to deliver value—and that depends entirely on starting in the right place.
The research on AI adoption in shipping is clear on what works:
Begin with pain points employees already know intimately in their maritime roles
Build trust through transparency about what AI can and cannot do in shipping operations
Fix data foundations in ways that help people immediately in their daily work
Support maritime professionals through training and clear guidance on AI tools
Keep early AI experiments tightly connected to employee workflows in vessel management
When AI is rooted in daily work rather than imposed on it, something changes. Instead of asking people to adapt to AI, you're adapting AI to help maritime professionals do their jobs better.
This approach does more than improve existing processes in shipping operations. It opens the door to entirely new ways of operating, collaborating, and creating value both at sea and on shore.
After establishing this foundation in maritime AI adoption, organisations can move to using AI for innovation and business development, identifying where real opportunities lie in the shipping industry, with tangible impact both tactically and strategically.
But it all starts with people, not technology.
Spot risks and ambiguous clauses before they cost you money
Full CP document analysis in 6 minutes
